Upgrades of homes under scheme to tackle fuel poverty hit three-year low in Scarborough

An elderly lady adjusting her thermostat on at home.
An elderly lady adjusting her thermostat on at home.

Installations of green energy measures designed to lift households out of fuel poverty have fallen to their lowest level for three years in Scarborough.

In Scarborough, there were 279 energy efficiency upgrades installed in the 12 months to December, according to the latest figures from the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

This was a fall of 21% compared to the same period in 2016.

The latest national figures show there were 12,500 improvements made to homes across Great Britain in February.

This is a fall of 33% compared to the same period in 2013, and 84% lower than a peak of 76,500 in 2014.

In total, 3,847 measures have been installed in 3,096 homes in Scarborough since the scheme was launched in 2013.

This means 62 in every 1,000 households have benefitted from at least one ECO measure – lower than the national average of 73.

Campaigners say the slowdown in the upgrade of homes across Great Britain under the flagship government scheme is “hugely worrying”.

Green Party MP Caroline Lucas said the fall in support for fuel-poor households is “morally indefensible”.

She added: “These numbers provide yet more evidence that the Conservatives have all but given up on the climate crisis.

“Not only that, they’re condemning two million people across the UK to continue living in fuel poverty.”

Peter Smith, director of policy and research at anti-fuel poverty charity National Energy Action, said: “ECO in isolation is not sufficient to meet statutory fuel poverty commitments, and it’s hugely worrying the rate of home energy efficiency improvements continues to dramatically slow, particularly in England.”

The charity wants to see new central investment to tackle fuel poverty introduced in the upcoming government spending review, he added, which would also improve local air quality and reduce health and social care costs.