'It has been a time-consuming process' ... and further delays could lie ahead: The saga of Scarborough Council's delayed accounts rumbles on

Scarborough Council’s external auditors have updated councillors on a long-running legal challenge that has led to the authority’s accounts not being signed off for the last five years.

Thursday, 16th July 2020, 1:11 pm
Updated Thursday, 16th July 2020, 1:14 pm

The council’s 2017/18, 2016/17 and 2015/16 accounts were held up as the authority is locked in a legal battle with a group of residents over how it classifies income and expenditure from Whitby harbour.

Last year it was confirmed that the 2018/19 accounts had also been caught up in the row.

Last month, the chairman of the council’s Audit Committee, Cllr Andrew Backhouse, called the situation “unacceptable” and challenged the authority’s auditors Mazars to explain the repeated delays to councillors.

Whitby harbour

In a report due to go to the Audit Committee on Wednesday next week, Mazars has said that it has been required to examine financial statements of the council from every year since its formation in 1974.

The report adds: “To comply with the requirements of the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014 we are required to carefully and thoroughly consider challenges made by local government electors.

“In the matter of the multiple challenges raised in connection with Whitby Harbour, this has been a time-consuming process, requiring analysis of a significant number of archived council records and involves legal interpretation of a number of statutes.

“A second provisional view was sent to the objector and council on 29 October 2019. We received a response from the objector’s QC and legal advisor which we are still considering.

“We have carried out additional procedures on the council’s accounts for Whitby Harbour and considered our own detailed legal advice.”

The auditors say they have had to examine several pieces of legislation, including one that dates back to 1861.

However, their update concludes that further delays could lie ahead even if it comes to a decision in the near future as any ruling would have to be scrutinised.

It adds: “Before we issue the ‘Statement of Reasons’ (the document setting out our conclusions), the view will be subject to detailed internal challenge and external review by Public Sector Audit Appointments.

“Once issued, the objector and council will have a period to respond to the statement before finalisation.”

The challenge has come from the Fight4Whitby pressure group which launched a legal challenge in 2016 citing the 1905 Whitby Urban District Council Act, which stated that income from Whitby harbour must be ring-fenced for use within the harbour.

Speaking during an Audit Committee meeting last month, Cllr Backhouse said the situation had to be concluded soon.

He said: “I find it completely unacceptable that this is rolling on and on and on and I would certainly suggest we put some immense pressure on Mazars to bring this to a head, bring this to our next meeting and let’s have a debate so we can sign off these accounts.

“I have never heard anything like this in all the time I have been on this council. I know there is a sticking point and I know it needs some resolution but this needs sorting. It doesn’t look good.”

A message from the editor

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

In order for us to continue to provide high quality and trusted local news on this free-to-read site, I am asking you to also please purchase a copy of our newspaper.

Our journalists are highly trained and our content is independently regulated by IPSO to some of the highest standards in the world. The dramatic events of 2020 are having a major impact on many of our local valued advertisers and consequently the advertising that we receive. We are now more reliant than ever on you helping us to provide you with news by buying a copy of our newspaper.

Thank you

Jean MacQuarrie

Editor-in-Chief